kerbal space program free return trajectory

#KERBAL SPACE PROGRAM FREE RETURN TRAJECTORY UPDATE#
#KERBAL SPACE PROGRAM FREE RETURN TRAJECTORY MODS#

A Kerbal on EVA can take, say, an electromagnet from the winch, unspooling the cable behind him, and attach the magnet to another craft. It consists of winch parts with several different 'grabbers' or other things (like airship anchors) that you can put on the end of the cable.

#KERBAL SPACE PROGRAM FREE RETURN TRAJECTORY MODS#

Squad has little excuse why they aren't putting out more, but my perception is folks are playing the game largely due to mods and Squad are resting on their laurels. I dabbled a bit with the Kerbal Attachment System mod. Lots of work has gone into balance vs stock. The plug-in he created for handling nuclear parts and their outputs is great. As it is, I donated to him through PayPal because the work is phenomenal compared to stock parts/systems. For example, if Nertea's 'near future' line of mods were paid DLC, I would absolutely pay for it. Graphically, and game-wise, many of the parts mods I use are superior to stock parts. Running things in the background, taking into consideration EC and life support while not flying a craft, etc. What I largely see as the problem is the inherent limitations of the game engines. Certain trajectories like the Apollo free return trajectory or that employed. Now that I run about 45 mods or so I've once or twice run into weird problems that long-time users complain about. Since the retirement of NASAs space shuttle fleet, orbital space tourism. Yeah, the work on re-skinning the old models is probably a good idea - but to posit that that's as much work as they can be expected to produce is total rubbish. Not that the new shinies aren't appreciated, but playability is a much bigger shiny imo.

#KERBAL SPACE PROGRAM FREE RETURN TRAJECTORY UPDATE#

I'm sure most people would love an entire update dedicated to fixing bugs and improving performance, but it seems the devs will keep putting out new shinies while fixing things here and there.

They either want the current devs to implement a lot more functionality and fix old bugs, or just leave it as it and get to building KSP v.2 or something. Seems like there are a lot of long-time players of KSP that just want to be done - not with the game, but this version. It's been in release (never mind early access) for years and years now, and most dev shops would have moved on to something else and, at best, would be just fixing bugs. It was never really clear why, and eventually I think they got to the point where they were refusing to add it simply because they had always refused to add it and that was the way things were.Īt this point, I'm well content to regard the game as complete, and if there are additional features to look at mods to provide them. There are of course several mods that can give a dV display, but it's something that the developers had refused to add to the base game for a long time. The part set which came with the expansion wasn't bad though. idiosyncratic set of parts that were made available at each segment of the mission). It left such a sour taste in my mouth that I never touched any of the others (mostly because of the very. I played just one of the included missions in Making History, the first one.

Kerbal space program free return trajectory